Introduction (100–200 words)
Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) platforms help care teams collect health data from patients outside the clinic, track trends, and intervene early—typically using connected devices (blood pressure cuffs, scales, pulse oximeters, CGMs, wearables) plus patient apps, clinician dashboards, and alerts.
RPM matters even more in 2026+ because healthcare systems are balancing capacity constraints, rising chronic disease burden, value-based contracts, and consumer expectations for “care from home.” Modern RPM is also evolving from “device data collection” into workflow automation, risk stratification, and closed-loop care pathways (education → adherence nudges → escalation → documentation).
Common use cases include:
- Hypertension and heart failure monitoring after discharge
- Diabetes and weight management programs
- COPD/asthma monitoring and inhaler adherence
- Post-surgical recovery and symptom tracking
- Maternal health monitoring and prenatal/postpartum support
When buying, evaluate:
- Device support and onboarding logistics
- Alerting, triage, and escalation workflows
- EHR interoperability (HL7/FHIR), APIs, and data export
- Patient engagement features (messaging, education, reminders)
- Analytics, risk scoring, and reporting (clinical + operational)
- Security controls (SSO, RBAC, audit logs, encryption)
- Multi-site scalability, reliability, and role-based workflows
- Implementation time, service model, and total cost of ownership
Mandatory paragraph
- Best for: care delivery organizations, provider groups, payers, digital health teams, and hospital-at-home programs that need continuous monitoring, proactive outreach, and documented workflows at scale—especially for chronic care and post-acute pathways.
- Not ideal for: teams that only need one-off telehealth visits, simple appointment reminders, or a standalone device app without clinical triage. If you don’t have staff/processes for outreach, an RPM platform may underperform versus lighter patient engagement tools.
Key Trends in Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Platforms for 2026 and Beyond
- AI-assisted triage and summarization: more platforms are adding AI to reduce alert fatigue by clustering signals, summarizing patient trajectories, and drafting clinician notes (with human review).
- Shift from “alerts” to “pathways”: RPM is increasingly packaged as configurable care pathways (enrollment → baseline → adherence → escalation → discharge) rather than raw vitals dashboards.
- Interoperability as a product feature: HL7 v2, FHIR APIs, event-based integrations, and identity matching are becoming core requirements, not “integration projects.”
- Device ecosystem consolidation (and exceptions): vendors are expanding device catalogs, but buyers also demand device-agnostic ingestion to avoid lock-in and keep supply chains flexible.
- Home logistics and fulfillment as differentiators: shipping, replacements, cellular connectivity, and patient tech support are now major selection criteria—especially for older populations.
- More rigorous security expectations: buyers increasingly require SSO/SAML, SCIM provisioning, audit logs, RBAC, tenant isolation, and third-party risk documentation.
- Hybrid care models: RPM is converging with virtual visits, asynchronous messaging, and care coordination to support “hospital-at-home” and longitudinal chronic care.
- Outcome + operations reporting: beyond clinical outcomes, buyers want queue performance, time-to-intervention, adherence metrics, and staffing/throughput dashboards.
- Pricing models moving toward program economics: per-member-per-month, per-enrolled-patient, and services-included bundles are common; buyers increasingly compare total program cost vs reimbursement or value-based savings.
- Data governance and consent management: more scrutiny on patient consent, data retention, secondary use, and cross-entity sharing—especially for multi-partner programs.
How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
- Prioritized vendors widely recognized for RPM programs across providers, payers, and digital health delivery.
- Evaluated feature completeness: device connectivity, patient engagement, clinician workflows, alerting, documentation, and reporting.
- Considered integration readiness: availability of APIs, common healthcare data standards support, and real-world integration patterns.
- Looked for signals of reliability and scalability: suitability for multi-site deployments, operational tooling, and program administration.
- Assessed security posture indicators based on publicly described capabilities (SSO, RBAC, auditing, encryption) without assuming certifications.
- Included a balanced mix: enterprise platforms, program-focused solutions, and device-centric RPM ecosystems that are often deployed at scale.
- Considered fit across segments (SMB, mid-market, enterprise) and across care models (chronic care, post-acute, hospital-at-home).
- Scoring is comparative and based on typical buyer needs; actual fit depends on your clinical workflows, device strategy, and integration environment.
Top 10 Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Platforms Tools
#1 — Biofourmis
Short description (2–3 lines): A clinical-grade RPM and digital therapeutics-oriented platform often positioned for complex chronic care and post-acute monitoring. Best suited to teams that want analytics-driven risk detection plus structured care workflows.
Key Features
- Multi-parameter remote monitoring with configurable alerting rules
- Risk stratification and trend detection to prioritize outreach
- Care pathway support for enrollment, monitoring, escalation, and discharge
- Patient engagement tools (education, reminders, messaging—varies by program)
- Reporting for clinical outcomes and operational performance
- Program configuration to support different conditions and cohorts
- Workflow support for clinical teams managing high-acuity populations
Pros
- Strong fit for clinical programs that need risk-based prioritization
- Built for continuous monitoring use cases beyond “basic vitals collection”
- Typically aligns well with post-acute and chronic pathways
Cons
- Implementation can be involved depending on integrations and scope
- May be more than needed for simple, low-touch RPM programs
- Pricing approach is Not publicly stated and may vary by deployment
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: Web / iOS / Android (patient experience varies)
- Deployment: Cloud (typical); Hybrid: Varies / N/A
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
Biofourmis deployments commonly require connectivity to device data sources and clinical systems. Integration patterns typically include standards-based feeds and vendor APIs, with implementation support for mapping and workflow alignment.
- APIs: Not publicly stated (availability varies by contract)
- EHR integration patterns: HL7/FHIR-based approaches (implementation-dependent)
- Device ecosystem connectivity: Varies by program and region
- Data export/warehouse support: Varies / N/A
- Identity and enrollment feeds: Varies / N/A
Support & Community
Enterprise-oriented onboarding and implementation are typical. Community footprint is limited compared to developer-first tools; support tiers are Varies / Not publicly stated.
#2 — Validic
Short description (2–3 lines): A healthcare data connectivity platform often used to power RPM by aggregating device and wearable data into clinical and analytics workflows. Best for organizations that want device-agnostic ingestion and flexibility.
Key Features
- Aggregation of connected device and wearable data (broad ecosystem approach)
- Normalization and routing of patient-generated health data
- Tools to help manage device connectivity at scale
- Data quality/validation handling (varies by integration method)
- Configurable data delivery to downstream systems
- Support for multi-program, multi-condition deployments
- Operational tooling for enrollment and device connectivity monitoring (varies)
Pros
- Strong option when you want to avoid device lock-in
- Useful for teams building RPM workflows into their own apps or care platforms
- Often fits well with data/engineering-led implementations
Cons
- Not a full end-to-end RPM care workflow product on its own in many deployments
- Requires complementary tooling for triage, messaging, and care documentation
- Time-to-value depends on your integration maturity
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: Web (admin tooling varies); APIs (typical)
- Deployment: Cloud
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
Validic is commonly selected for its ecosystem approach—connecting to many device clouds and passing data to care management systems.
- Device/wearable connectivity: Broad; exact catalog varies
- Data delivery to downstream tools: APIs and feeds (details vary)
- Interop with EHRs: Usually via partner middleware or standards-based interfaces
- Data lake/warehouse pipelines: Varies by customer architecture
- Webhooks/events: Not publicly stated
Support & Community
Typically enterprise support with implementation guidance. Developer documentation exists but depth varies by contract; public community is limited / not a primary channel.
#3 — Current Health (Best Buy Health)
Short description (2–3 lines): An RPM platform often used for hospital-at-home and post-acute monitoring programs, combining patient monitoring, escalation workflows, and operational support models.
Key Features
- Remote monitoring across multiple vital signs (program-dependent)
- Patient-facing kit approach for in-home onboarding (varies by program)
- Clinician dashboards for trends, thresholds, and escalation
- Triage workflows and alert management for clinical teams
- Program operations tooling (cohorts, protocols, enrollment)
- Support for home-based care models (hospital-at-home style workflows)
- Reporting for utilization and adherence (varies)
Pros
- Strong fit for home-based acute/post-acute pathways
- Operational model can reduce burden on internal teams (depending on services)
- Purpose-built for scaling beyond small pilots
Cons
- May be heavier than needed for routine chronic RPM
- Device strategy can be more “kit-based” than BYOD
- Integration depth varies and may require project work
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: Web / iOS / Android (patient experience varies)
- Deployment: Cloud
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
Integrations typically center on connecting monitoring outputs to clinical workflows and documentation systems.
- EHR connectivity: Varies; commonly implemented via standards-based interfaces
- Notifications and paging tools: Varies / N/A
- Data export for analytics: Varies / N/A
- APIs: Not publicly stated
- Device ecosystem: Program-dependent kits and supported peripherals
Support & Community
Generally implementation-led with enterprise support. Community is not a major factor; support and service options are Varies / Not publicly stated.
#4 — Health Recovery Solutions (HRS)
Short description (2–3 lines): An RPM platform known for supporting care teams with patient engagement, education, and remote monitoring workflows—often used by hospitals, home health, and post-acute programs.
Key Features
- Patient engagement and education modules tied to monitoring programs
- Remote vitals monitoring with configurable thresholds and alerts
- Care team dashboard for triage and patient status visibility
- Messaging/communication capabilities (feature set varies)
- Protocol-based workflows for common conditions and post-acute use cases
- Operational reporting on adherence and engagement
- Patient onboarding support models (varies by contract)
Pros
- Practical for organizations that need education + monitoring together
- Often aligns with transitional care and post-discharge follow-up
- Built with clinical workflows in mind (not just device data)
Cons
- Device and workflow flexibility may be constrained by packaged programs
- Integration depth and API availability can be implementation-dependent
- International support and localization may vary by region
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: Web / iOS / Android (varies by implementation)
- Deployment: Cloud
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
HRS is typically deployed as part of a broader care delivery stack, so integration needs often include EHR documentation and patient identity workflows.
- EHR interfaces: Varies (often standards-based)
- Device connectivity: Supported device set varies
- Analytics exports: Varies / N/A
- APIs/webhooks: Not publicly stated
- Care coordination tools: Varies / N/A
Support & Community
Support is generally enterprise-style with onboarding assistance. Documentation/community visibility is Varies / Not publicly stated.
#5 — Teladoc Health (including Livongo programs)
Short description (2–3 lines): A virtual care company that offers chronic care programs and remote monitoring components as part of broader virtual-first services. Best for organizations seeking integrated virtual care + coaching style programs.
Key Features
- Chronic condition programs (e.g., cardiometabolic-focused program structures)
- Remote monitoring inputs paired with coaching and engagement (program-dependent)
- Patient experience designed for ongoing participation and adherence
- Clinical support workflows and outreach models (varies by contract)
- Reporting around engagement and outcomes (program-dependent)
- Optional expansion into broader virtual care services beyond RPM
- Scalable program administration for large populations
Pros
- Good fit when you want RPM as part of a packaged chronic care program
- Can reduce the need to assemble multiple vendors (depending on scope)
- Often suitable for payer/employer-style population programs
Cons
- Less ideal if you need a highly customizable, build-your-own RPM platform
- Integration specifics can be limited to what the program supports
- Some features may be bundled; pricing transparency is limited
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: Web / iOS / Android
- Deployment: Cloud
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
Ecosystem value often comes from Teladoc’s broader virtual care footprint. Integrations depend on whether you are embedding into an EHR workflow or running a parallel program.
- Data exchange with customer systems: Varies / N/A
- EHR integration approach: Varies by customer and scope
- Device connectivity: Program-dependent
- APIs: Not publicly stated
- SSO/identity integration: Not publicly stated
Support & Community
Typically comes with program implementation and ongoing operations support. Community/developer ecosystem is limited compared to API-first platforms.
#6 — Philips Remote Patient Monitoring (Philips)
Short description (2–3 lines): A large healthcare vendor offering RPM capabilities within a broader clinical ecosystem. Best for enterprises that value vendor stability, clinical hardware experience, and enterprise procurement alignment.
Key Features
- RPM capabilities aligned with enterprise clinical environments
- Support for multi-site deployments and operational governance
- Device and clinical ecosystem alignment (varies by offering and region)
- Dashboarding and alert workflows for clinical teams
- Reporting for program performance (varies)
- Services and implementation support through enterprise engagements
- Potential alignment with broader Philips care delivery solutions
Pros
- Often aligns with enterprise purchasing and long-term roadmaps
- Good fit when RPM is part of a broader vendor-standardized stack
- Typically strong implementation resources (scope-dependent)
Cons
- May be less agile for highly custom workflows or rapid iteration
- Integration and configuration can be “enterprise project” scale
- Total cost can be higher than niche RPM vendors (varies)
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: Web / iOS / Android (varies by product package)
- Deployment: Cloud / Hybrid (Varies by offering)
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
Philips RPM deployments frequently involve integration with enterprise clinical systems and identity workflows.
- EHR integration: Varies; commonly standards-based in enterprise settings
- Device ecosystem: Varies by region and package
- Data exports: Varies / N/A
- APIs: Not publicly stated
- Enterprise identity tooling: Not publicly stated
Support & Community
Enterprise support and implementation are typical. Community/developer presence is not a primary selection factor; support varies by contract and region.
#7 — ResMed (including Propeller Health)
Short description (2–3 lines): A respiratory-focused ecosystem with monitoring and adherence capabilities often associated with inhaler usage and respiratory disease management. Best for asthma/COPD programs needing condition-specific workflows.
Key Features
- Respiratory condition monitoring and adherence tracking (solution-dependent)
- Patient engagement to support medication adherence behaviors
- Clinician views into trends and risk signals for respiratory cohorts
- Program reporting for engagement and outcomes (varies)
- Device- and sensor-oriented approach for respiratory data capture
- Support for population-level respiratory management
- Workflow tooling tailored to respiratory use cases (varies)
Pros
- Strong domain fit for respiratory programs (not generic RPM)
- Can help make adherence and usage patterns more visible
- Good option for targeted cohorts where specificity matters
Cons
- Less suitable as a general-purpose RPM platform across many conditions
- Device/sensor approach may not match BYOD strategies
- Integration breadth varies by deployment
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: Web / iOS / Android (varies by solution)
- Deployment: Cloud
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
Integrations often focus on bringing respiratory insights into care management and analytics workflows.
- EHR connectivity: Varies / N/A
- APIs: Not publicly stated
- Data exports for analytics: Varies / N/A
- Device/sensor ecosystem: Respiratory-focused; specifics vary
- Care program partners: Varies / N/A
Support & Community
Commercial support is typical; public community is limited. Implementation assistance and service levels are Varies / Not publicly stated.
#8 — Omron VitalSight
Short description (2–3 lines): An RPM-oriented solution with strong alignment to blood pressure monitoring workflows. Best for hypertension programs and primary care/cardiology groups focused on BP control.
Key Features
- Blood pressure monitoring program support (solution-dependent)
- Connectivity with BP devices and patient measurement workflows
- Dashboards for trend review and out-of-range identification
- Patient reminders and adherence support (varies)
- Clinician workflows for reviewing readings and follow-up
- Reporting for program oversight (varies)
- Program setup aimed at cardiometabolic needs (varies)
Pros
- Clear fit for hypertension-focused RPM efforts
- Typically simpler than broad hospital-at-home platforms
- Works well when BP is the primary signal
Cons
- Not a full multi-condition RPM platform for complex monitoring needs
- Feature depth outside BP-centric workflows may be limited
- Integration options vary and may be less flexible than API-first tools
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: Web / iOS / Android (varies)
- Deployment: Cloud
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
Common needs include integrating BP readings into clinical documentation and analytics.
- Device connectivity: BP-centric; device specifics vary
- EHR integration: Varies / N/A
- APIs: Not publicly stated
- Data export: Varies / N/A
- Identity/SSO: Not publicly stated
Support & Community
Support is typically commercial with onboarding guidance. Community footprint is limited; support tiers are Varies / Not publicly stated.
#9 — Withings Health Solutions
Short description (2–3 lines): A device-oriented remote monitoring ecosystem built around consumer-friendly hardware (e.g., scales, BP monitors) and associated data flows. Best for wellness-to-clinical bridge programs and lower-acuity monitoring.
Key Features
- Connected health devices with patient-friendly UX (hardware-led approach)
- Data collection and trend visualization for common vitals
- Patient onboarding experience aligned with device usage
- Basic alerts and thresholding (varies)
- Data sharing capabilities for care programs (varies)
- Program reporting (varies)
- Multi-device support within the Withings ecosystem
Pros
- Strong patient adoption potential due to familiar consumer-grade UX
- Good for lower-acuity monitoring where simplicity matters
- Can be cost-effective for certain programs (varies by region and kit)
Cons
- May not meet complex clinical workflow needs without additional software
- Enterprise integration depth may be more limited than platform-first vendors
- Advanced triage, escalation, and documentation workflows may require add-ons
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: iOS / Android / Web (varies by product components)
- Deployment: Cloud
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
Withings is often evaluated for device ecosystem fit; integration needs depend on how you plan to ingest data into clinical workflows.
- Device ecosystem: Withings devices (catalog varies by market)
- Data export/integration: Varies / N/A
- APIs: Not publicly stated
- EHR connectivity: Typically requires additional integration work
- Partner ecosystems: Varies / N/A
Support & Community
Support varies by program and geography. Community is not a primary differentiator; documentation availability is Varies / Not publicly stated.
#10 — TytoCare
Short description (2–3 lines): A remote examination and monitoring-oriented solution built around a connected exam kit (e.g., heart/lung sounds, otoscopy) plus clinician workflows. Best for virtual-first primary care and pediatrics-style remote assessments.
Key Features
- Connected remote exam kit to capture clinical-grade observations (solution-dependent)
- Patient-guided exam flows for remote assessment
- Clinician review tools for captured exam data
- Optional integration into virtual care workflows (varies)
- Case management and documentation support (varies)
- Support for distributed care teams and virtual clinics
- Program reporting and utilization analytics (varies)
Pros
- Valuable when you need remote exam capability, not just vitals
- Useful for urgent care/primary care models seeking better virtual assessments
- Differentiated data types compared to standard RPM (sounds/images)
Cons
- Not a “general vitals RPM” platform by default; different primary purpose
- Requires patient comfort with guided device usage
- Integration and workflow tailoring can be non-trivial
Platforms / Deployment
- Platforms: iOS / Android / Web (clinician portal varies)
- Deployment: Cloud
Security & Compliance
- SSO/SAML: Not publicly stated
- MFA: Not publicly stated
- Encryption: Not publicly stated
- Audit logs / RBAC: Not publicly stated
- HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / GDPR: Not publicly stated
Integrations & Ecosystem
TytoCare is often deployed alongside telehealth and care management systems; integration needs focus on scheduling, documentation, and identity.
- Telehealth workflow integration: Varies / N/A
- EHR integration: Varies / N/A
- APIs: Not publicly stated
- Data export: Varies / N/A
- Device ecosystem: TytoCare exam kit and peripherals (varies)
Support & Community
Commercial onboarding is typical. Public community is limited; support tiers and SLAs are Varies / Not publicly stated.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
| Tool Name | Best For | Platform(s) Supported | Deployment (Cloud/Self-hosted/Hybrid) | Standout Feature | Public Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofourmis | High-acuity chronic + post-acute RPM programs | Web / iOS / Android (varies) | Cloud | Risk-based monitoring and pathway support | N/A |
| Validic | Device-agnostic data ingestion for RPM | Web (varies) / APIs | Cloud | Broad connectivity and data normalization | N/A |
| Current Health (Best Buy Health) | Hospital-at-home and post-acute monitoring | Web / iOS / Android (varies) | Cloud | Home-based care workflow orientation | N/A |
| Health Recovery Solutions (HRS) | Post-discharge + education-driven RPM | Web / iOS / Android (varies) | Cloud | Patient education integrated with monitoring | N/A |
| Teladoc Health (Livongo programs) | Packaged chronic care programs | Web / iOS / Android | Cloud | Program-based model with coaching/engagement | N/A |
| Philips RPM | Enterprise health systems standardizing vendors | Web / iOS / Android (varies) | Cloud / Hybrid (varies) | Enterprise alignment and services | N/A |
| ResMed (Propeller Health) | Respiratory disease management programs | Web / iOS / Android (varies) | Cloud | Respiratory-specific adherence insights | N/A |
| Omron VitalSight | Hypertension/BP monitoring programs | Web / iOS / Android (varies) | Cloud | BP-centric workflow focus | N/A |
| Withings Health Solutions | Lower-acuity monitoring with consumer-friendly devices | iOS / Android / Web (varies) | Cloud | Patient-friendly connected device ecosystem | N/A |
| TytoCare | Remote exams for virtual-first care | iOS / Android / Web (varies) | Cloud | Remote examination kit + clinician review | N/A |
Evaluation & Scoring of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Platforms
Weights:
- Core features – 25%
- Ease of use – 15%
- Integrations & ecosystem – 15%
- Security & compliance – 10%
- Performance & reliability – 10%
- Support & community – 10%
- Price / value – 15%
| Tool Name | Core (25%) | Ease (15%) | Integrations (15%) | Security (10%) | Performance (10%) | Support (10%) | Value (15%) | Weighted Total (0–10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofourmis | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7.70 |
| Validic | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7.75 |
| Current Health (Best Buy Health) | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7.35 |
| Health Recovery Solutions (HRS) | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7.50 |
| Teladoc Health (Livongo programs) | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6.95 |
| Philips RPM | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7.40 |
| ResMed (Propeller Health) | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7.10 |
| Omron VitalSight | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7.00 |
| Withings Health Solutions | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6.70 |
| TytoCare | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6.60 |
How to interpret these scores:
- Scores are comparative, not absolute; a “7.5” can be the right choice if it matches your workflows and constraints.
- “Core” emphasizes breadth of RPM workflows (monitoring, triage, pathways), not just device support.
- “Integrations” rewards device-agnosticism, API maturity, and standards-based connectivity patterns.
- “Value” reflects typical program economics and flexibility, but actual pricing is often contract-based.
Which Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Platforms Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
RPM platforms are rarely a fit for truly solo clinicians unless you’re operating a niche concierge practice with clear operational capacity for outreach.
- Consider device-centric, simpler stacks first (BP + messaging + manual documentation).
- If you must run RPM, prioritize ease of use and patient onboarding over maximum configurability.
- Shortlist: Omron VitalSight (BP programs), Withings Health Solutions (lower-acuity monitoring).
SMB
SMBs usually win by choosing one primary program (e.g., hypertension or post-discharge) and nailing enrollment + adherence.
- If you want a packaged program model: Teladoc Health can fit (scope-dependent).
- If you’re building your own workflows and app experience: Validic can power device ingestion while you keep control.
- For post-discharge education + monitoring emphasis: HRS is often aligned.
Mid-Market
Mid-market organizations tend to operate multiple programs and need stronger triage workflows, staffing analytics, and integration patterns.
- For hospital-at-home/post-acute growth: Current Health is a strong consideration.
- For multi-condition monitoring with risk prioritization: Biofourmis can fit well.
- For respiratory-specific cohorts: ResMed (Propeller Health) can be a targeted add-on alongside a general platform.
Enterprise
Enterprises usually care most about security reviews, uptime, multi-site governance, and integration reliability.
- If you standardize with large vendors and want enterprise services: Philips RPM may align with procurement and long-term roadmaps.
- For complex chronic/post-acute programs with advanced stratification: Biofourmis is often evaluated.
- For device-agnostic ingestion across many device types and programs: Validic is commonly used as a core connectivity layer.
Budget vs Premium
- Budget-sensitive: prioritize lower operational overhead and patient-friendly kits. Consider Withings Health Solutions or a focused program like Omron VitalSight for BP.
- Premium / high-acuity: focus on triage workflows, reliability, and program operations: Biofourmis or Current Health.
Feature Depth vs Ease of Use
- If clinical teams need turnkey workflows, choose a platform with packaged pathways and dashboards (e.g., HRS, Current Health).
- If you have product/engineering resources and want maximum flexibility, choose a data/connectivity-centric option (e.g., Validic) and build workflows in your care platform.
Integrations & Scalability
- If you must integrate into multiple EHR instances and analytics stacks, prioritize vendors that can support standards-based feeds and repeatable implementation patterns (often enterprise vendors or connectivity-first platforms).
- If you’re scaling from 500 to 50,000 patients, validate: queue performance, alert routing, role design, bulk enrollment, and operational reporting.
Security & Compliance Needs
- Don’t treat “HIPAA-ready” as a checkbox. Require vendor answers on:
- SSO/SAML and least-privilege RBAC
- Audit logs and exportability for investigations
- Data retention and deletion workflows
- Vendor access controls and support access processes
- In practice, larger deployments often pick vendors with mature enterprise controls (often Philips, and enterprise-focused RPM vendors), but you must confirm in your security review since many details are Not publicly stated.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What’s the difference between RPM and telehealth?
Telehealth is typically visit-based (video/phone). RPM is continuous or recurring monitoring using device data and workflows to detect risk and intervene between visits.
Do RPM platforms include devices, or do I buy them separately?
It varies. Some vendors offer kit-based programs; others are device-agnostic and integrate with multiple device manufacturers. Always confirm fulfillment, replacements, and connectivity options.
How do RPM platforms typically charge?
Common models include per enrolled patient, per member per month, or bundled program pricing with services. Exact pricing is often Not publicly stated and contract-dependent.
How long does implementation take?
A basic pilot can take weeks, while enterprise integrations and governance can take months. The timeline depends heavily on EHR integration scope, device logistics, and workflow sign-off.
What are the most common RPM implementation mistakes?
- Launching without staffing for outreach and escalation
- Over-alerting (too many thresholds, not enough prioritization)
- Underestimating device logistics and patient support needs
- Treating integration as “optional” and then struggling with documentation
How do I reduce alert fatigue?
Use tiered thresholds, trend-based rules, and escalation policies. Look for platforms that support risk stratification, quiet hours, alert deduplication, and queue-based triage workflows.
What integrations matter most for ROI?
Most teams benefit from: patient identity/enrollment feeds, documentation back into clinical systems, and analytics exports. Even without deep EHR embedding, ensure you can export structured data.
Can I switch RPM platforms later?
Yes, but plan early for data portability. Ask about historical data export, device reassignment workflows, and how patient accounts are handled during migration.
Are AI features reliable enough to trust in RPM?
AI can help summarize trends and prioritize queues, but it should be treated as decision support, not autonomous clinical decision-making. Require transparency on what the AI does and how humans approve actions.
What security controls should I ask for in 2026+?
At minimum: encryption in transit/at rest, RBAC, audit logs, SSO/SAML, MFA, and well-documented vendor access policies. Certifications can help, but specifics are often Not publicly stated—verify in procurement.
What if I only need blood pressure monitoring?
A focused BP program tool can be more cost-effective and easier to roll out. Consider BP-centric solutions (e.g., Omron VitalSight) rather than a full hospital-at-home platform.
What are alternatives to a full RPM platform?
Depending on needs: chronic care management software, patient engagement platforms, device manufacturer apps, or custom-built workflows using connectivity layers (e.g., a data ingestion platform + your care management system).
Conclusion
RPM platforms have shifted from simple vitals dashboards into workflow engines for proactive care—combining device data, patient engagement, triage queues, and reporting that can stand up to operational and clinical scrutiny. In 2026+, the strongest differentiators are less about “can it capture data?” and more about how reliably it fits your staffing model, integration environment, and care pathways.
There isn’t a single best platform for everyone. Start by choosing a primary use case (hypertension, post-acute, hospital-at-home, respiratory, or remote exams), then shortlist 2–3 vendors, run a time-boxed pilot, and validate: device logistics, alert burden, workflow fit, and your security/integration requirements before scaling.